Showing posts with label oligarchy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oligarchy. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

80 people own more than 3.7 billion.

I read at Global Research, citing OXFAM (one of the few charitable NGOs that really has a conscience) that the World's 80 wealthiest individuals own more than the less affluent 50% of the global population. Reality can be even worse because some very rich individuals such as monarchs are not included in the sources and the exact accountancy of their wealth is not fully clear anyhow. 

Another finding is:
The Credit Suisse Global Wealth Databook 2014 presents on its page 98, a global wealth pyramid, which indicates that the world’s richest 0.7% (35 million people) own $115.9 trillion, while the poorest 99.3% (4,665 million people) own $147.3 trillion. It also shows that the richest 8.6% own $224.5T (trillion), while the poorest 91.4% own only $38.7T. (Or, in other words: the richest 8.6% own 5.8 times as much as do the poorest 91.4%.)

Finally they mention that scientific research demonstrates that the USA is no longer a democracy but an oligarchy (pretty much like Russia). The power of the common people to influence policy in the USA is effectively almost zero nowadays. 

They don't say but much of that is because of private property of the mass media, which are concentrated in very few hands. These have globally rigged the market so media are not anymore profitable in most cases, becoming exclusively an investment for their influence, something every stinkingly rich oligarch must have but not because they make any profit, not directly, but because they serve to influence policy and politics in general.

It is the same in Europe and in almost every other place. I guess that the few exceptions may be found in Latin America, where a few countries like Venezuela or Bolivia can be considered truly democratic, with common people actually making a difference, or in Greece. 


Marx predicted it

But back to the economy: this horrible situation of extreme and growing inequality, of extreme concentration of wealth and power in very few hands, is exactly the predictable and actually predicted outcome of Capitalism in the "end of times" (so to say): an unproductive rentier oligarchy, every day more extremely financier and speculative and corrupt to the marrow is parasitizing the global economy. This minuscule group of hyper-rich cannot of course generate much demand (some luxuries but nothing otherwise), what actually plunges the real economy into catastrophe as the bulk of the people is deprived of even the most basic means of life (salaries that don't even pay the rent, you know the deal, you probably live through it in one or another form). 

The result, the unavoidable and already ongoing result is a dramatic implosion of the whole economy, produce that doesn't sell, even if people would like to buy it (but nope: they can't afford even the very basics), deflation that causes the collapse of even correctly managed productive companies, accumulation of the nominal wealth in the speculative-financial sector, a gambling residual economy that is absolutely unsustainable (more money invested in betting against the success of companies and countries than in favor of their success). No future at all for this scenario. I doubt it survives to 2020. 

But regardless of the sustainability, or rather total lack of it, of the current speculative global economy (or rather eco-chaos, because there is no nomos whatsoever in it anymore), the dramatic effects it is having and will have on the vast majority of the population can't be exaggerated: each month, each year greater and greater fractions of the global people are being pushed to the extremes of near-impossible survival, what causes desperate mass migrations, riots and what-not. Only the low level of class consciousness and popular organization prevent this situation from evolving into full fledged revolutions in more and more places. Mind you that the growing victories of "Bolivarians" or now also Syriza in Greece must be considered as revolutionary because they are active expressions of the extreme exhaustion of the peoples and their growing desire to try anything but this endless and hopeless plunder. 

Sometimes, rarely, even mercenary politicians, in Freudian slip, speak the truth. The Secretary General of the ruling People's Party of Spain, María Dolores de Cospedal, is one of those. In two occasions she was recorded reminding us "how hard they have worked to plunder the country", confusing the Spanish word sanear (to clean up) for saquear (to plunder, to loot).

And that's the truth: they are looting not just this or that country but the whole planet Earth. It's a bit like the flying party of Douglas Adams: until the last pack of chips is exhausted, until the whole planet underneath has become scorched earth... they will continue with the looting. 

Unless we impede it. Time to sharpen the pitchforks.

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Massive peodiphilia scandal shatters British political class

Westminster palace
Insistent rumors happened to be true. At least 40 British politicians, very possibly more, are implicated in recurrent children abuse. Too many and too powerful to be investigated, until now?

The criminal scandal goes back to at least the 1980s but cover-up and missing dossiers delayed the investigation three decades. The criminals belong to all three major political parties: Tory, Labour and Liberals, what underlines that the persistent rumors about pedophile rings being widespread among the power elites, not just politicians, are very much real.

Why would politicians risk their careers for a sexual abuse caprice? A growing suspicion is that children abuse has been a key part of power elites' networking for way too long. The details are obscure but it seems to me that it is the same kind of "sub-clinical psychopath" who is drawn to power-climbing and other forms of bullying, of which child abuse is just one of the most extreme of them. 

Bullies draw their sick emotional satisfaction from inflicting damage to others with impunity (they do fear punishment and that's why they are "sub-clinical"). The most sophisticated of bullies is the Machiavellian, for which power becomes both means for their sick hobby of inflicting pain to others and an end in itself. Not every bully becomes a Machiavellian but every Machiavellian is a bully.

Machiavellians are obsessed with the value of authority (hierarchical obedience) but also with those of purity and ingroup loyalty. However those not belonging to their group (their power network, ethnic or religious group, etc.) are irrelevant for them, unlike what happens with normal healthy people. 

It is interesting that they are obsessed with purity, because what represents purity better than a child? Maybe it is their psychological (and psychopathic) mindset what draws them to pedophilia in such large numbers?

Monday, September 2, 2013

Greece: direct action against repressive governor

A group of people self described as "Solidarians" attacked on Saturday the luxury resort of the Governor of Epirus in retaliation for the eviction of squats, damaging elements of the property and the cars of his posh guests. 

In their own words:
Yesterday night, 30/8, we visited uninvited the private resort that the family of Epirus regional governor, Alekos Kachrimanis, maintains at the city of Ioannina. There occurred a feast for the celebration of his name day. We couldn’t have missed the chance to be there to wish happy name day to him warmly! The specific guy, along with other local rulers and the administrator of the Chatzikosta general hospital, Fotis Vavvas, had participated last April at a conference on the topic of finding a definite solution for putting an end to the months-long occupation of premises at the former Chatzikosta hospital. We hold the aforementioned gentleman co-responsible for the eviction of Antiviosi squat, and we remind him that buildings like this one are spaces that have already been reclaimed, and constitute cores of social resistance and struggle. Really, that’s the reason why they are being targeted by the repression of state power and all of its sidekicks.

For all these reasons, we got ourselves at the yard of the resort yesterday, where the banquet was underway, with a purpose to cause disruption and put an end to it, and as an act of solidarity with Antiviosi squat. We painted “Antiviosi squat will stay” at the wall of the yard, while we shouted slogans such as: “10, 100, 1000 squats against a world of organized sepsis”, and “Antiviosi squat will stay; the flame we lit cannot be put out by anyone.” Also, we smashed the windows and mirrors of two super luxury cars that belonged to guests of the regional governor.

IDEAS CAN NEITHER BE EVICTED, NOR SILENCED SOLIDARITY WITH THE SQUATS
 
solidarians

Source: Contra Info.

Sunday, August 18, 2013

[Was false news] Uruguayan President rejected from international act after being confused with "commoner"

Correction: this news was false. My apologies for the error.

Webguerrillero published today a formal correction: the whole news was accidentally taken from a humor site and they did not notice. Ironically many "serious" media through the world took it as real.

President Mujica at home
The President of Uruguay José "Pepe" Mujica was impeded to attend the inauguration of his Paraguayan colleague Horacio Cartes, after security confused him with a "commoner". 

For some reason Mr. Mujica, who lives a very simple life, without any luxuries whatsoever, arrived late to the inauguration, after the rest of the Uruguayan delegation had already entered the event. Security personnel were not able to recognize him and did not let him enter. 

Luckily the Chancellor arrived then with his credentials and he was allowed in.

Afterwards excuses were issued:
We knew well who was Mujica and that he was very austere... What we did not know was that he was so extremely so. Please put yourselves in our skin, seeing that a plain commoner wanted to enter in a place with so many important people, without accreditation and alone rang all alarms and forced us to impede him access.

You get it, right? There are two kinds of people: oligarchs and commoners, and among all Presidents on Earth, only Mujica (and surely Evo) is like us, commoners.

Source: Webguerrillero[es].

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Honduras: legal representative of farmer union murdered

A. Trejo (left) and other activists
Yesterday night at 21:40, Antonio Trejo Cabrera was murdered near the Tocontín International Airport, dying within the hour. He was the legal representative of one of the several cooperative farmer movements of the Lower Aguán, known by its acronym MARCA.

Trejo had been threatened often before. Would he have been a wealthy member of the elite we'd be talking "terrorism" and what not, but he was just another commoner, worse: someone still hoping and fighting for justice and dignity, and therefore his murder will go ignored in the international media.

Trejo managed the legal issues of three cooperatives of the MARCA: San Isidro, La Trinidad and El Despertar. He was arrested along many other farmers and citizens on August 21st protesting before the Supreme Court.

His murder is yet another clear case of class terrorism by the oligarchy against those workers who dare to stand up and fight for their rights. The MUCA (another farmer union) names those necessarily behind this crime, the mafioso landowners Miguel Facusse, René Morales, Reinaldo Canales, as well as the machinery of the state, which is 200% at their service since the 2009 coup. 

Source: LINyM[es].


Update (Sep 24): professional assassination:

It has been known now that Antonio Trejo, attorney and evangelical pastor, suffered five shots, two of them to the head (deadly), two to the side of the thorax (one of which destroyed a lung) and the fifth to the leg (femur boken).

In the days before his murder he had been very active, along many farmers and other activists, denouncing how the judges were trying to revert the only concession of lands to farmers so far in the endless legal, political and often armed conflict with the palm oil caciques.

Also he took part in the denounce of the de facto President, usurper Porfirio Lobo and the President of Congress, Juan Ramón Hernández, were committing high treason by ceding parts of the national territory to "libertarian" US agents.

The murder happened just a few blocs away from the Border Police station but not a single agent arrived to the scene of crime but much later. The assassin apparently used night-vision technology because the shots were all very precise in spite of the location being in almost total darkness at the time.

It is also meaningful how fast the state attorneys have dismissed the crime as unrelated to politics and performed by alleged common criminals. 

Source: LINyM[es].


Saturday, September 22, 2012

Tokyo: hundreds of thousands protesting against strongman Edano

Technically in Saitama city, part of Greater Tokyo and relatively close to the center: tens or hundreds of thousands have spontaneously massed in the streets rallying against the all powerful Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Yukio Edano, the true strongman of Japan representing the capitalist oligarchy. 

Source: Ex-SKF (there was a UStream but apparently not anymore). 


Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Occupied Social Center 'Casablanca' in Madrid evicted overnight

Without judiciary order, just by diktat of the provincial governor (chief of the police), who seems in connivance with speculator real state group Monteverde Grupo Inmobiliario S.L.

Madriz Rebelde[es], explains that this mafioso group, ultimately linked to the Marbella speculator mafias and the most rancid fascist oligarchy of Spain, operates mostly in Madrid and Barcelona but also Bilbao and Valencia as of late, being in full expansion in spite of the burst of the real state bubble. The company is 90% owned by Carlos Monteverde Mesa, 5% by Ramón Hermosilla, 5% by Manuel García Álvarez and has also as non-stockholder councilor to Fernando Fernández-Tapias, son of his namesake father, former president of the Capitalist Syndicate of Madrid, CEIM.

Ironically the company went bankrupt in 2010, defaulting €177 million. But even unable to sell their properties, be them picassos, airplanes or buildings in the center of Madrid, the mafioso company still seems to have enough connections to circumvent the judicial system and evict by decree this social occupied center.



Another source: Bilboko Okupazioa Buelegoa[es].


Update: it seems that the eviction is part of the increased police efforts to prevent social protests, notably the planned "siege to Congress" for the 26th. See here.

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Honduras: mass arrests and destruction of farms - SAB Miller culprit!

Without any court order or anything, the Honduran police, barely a mercenary appendix for the landowners and Gringo "libertarian" (= ultracapitalist fascist) colonial tyrants, have attacked and destroyed at dawn some 100 farming plots (manzanas) which were almost ripe for harvest. 

The peasants had previously taken those lots from sugar companies, which had occupied them illegally to begin with. The losses amount to five million lempiras ($250,000).

Previously, some 30 people were arrested (with plate-less vehicles) in the town of San Manuel Cortés.

All these actions are enticed by two sugar companies: Azucarera Hondureña and Azucarera del Norte, this last one property of SAB Miller beer company, which produces these brands (on their own or by license): Bavaria, Coors, Carlsberg, Guinness, Castle Lager, Dreher Classic, Tyskie, Gambrinus, Águila, Coca-Cola, Fanta, etc.

Boycott these products if you can.

Sources[es]: LINyM, Defensores en Línea.

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

The shadow of Goldman Sachs is elongated - or Draghi and the G30

(source)
As you probably know by now, Euro-bankster capo di capi Mario Draghi is a former partner of the infamous Goldman Sachs, whose political clout was enough to send the Western World to Hell just for them to stay alive, while their rivals of Lehman were left to die. As you may know also, GS employees are well known by their loyalty to the firm (or should we say "cult"?), whose global power is truly disturbing and would seem to demand chop-chop anti-monopoly action (but nope).

But we do not know everything about Draghi, arguably the most powerful man of Europe and one of the key financial players of the World. Naked Capitalism discusses today some of his story past and present:

Draghi, dubbed "a craven moneyman" by former Italian President F. Cossiga, was responsible of the European operations of Goldman Sachs from 2002 to 2005, precisely when the Greek accounts got muddied by GS intervention. Only for that reason we can well say that putting him on the ECB's gilded throne is like putting the fox to guard the chickens.

But there is more. Draghi is member of the powerful and ill-known banking lobby (promoted by the Rockefeller Foundation since 1978) which goes under the name of Group of Thirty (G30 for short), incidentally chaired by his predecessor at the ECB, Jean Claude Trichet.

The membership (32 people) of the G30 is quite revealing (in purple Goldman Sachs adepts):

  • Paul Volcker - Chairman Emeritus; former Chairman of President Barack Obama's Economic Recovery Advisory Board; former Chairman of the US Federal Reserve
  • Jacob A. Frenkel - Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Chairman of JPMorgan Chase International; former Chairman, Bank of Israel; former Chairman, Merryll Lynch; former Chairman, Inter-American Development Bank; former Vice-Chairman, Board of Governors, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development; Member, Trilateral Commission; Member, Investment Advisory Council to the Prime Minister of Turkey; Member, International Advisory Council, China Development Bank
  • Geoffrey L. Bell - Executive Secretary; President Geoffrey Bell and Company
  • Jean-Claude Trichet - Former President, European Central Bank; Honorary Governor, Banque de France
  • Leszek Balcerowicz - Professor, Warsaw School of Economics; former President, National Bank of Poland
  • Mark Carney - Governor, Bank of Canada; member, Board of Directors, Bank for International Settlements; Chairman, Financial Stability Board; former Partner and Managing Director, Goldman Sachs.
  • Jaime Caruana - General Manager, Bank for International Settlements; former Governor, Banco de España
  • Domingo Cavallo - Chairman and CEO, DFC Associates, LLC; former (infamous!) Minister of Economy, Argentina
  • E. Gerald Corrigan - Managing Director, Goldman Sachs; former President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York - politically investigated in Britain for the Greek debt cover-up scandal
  • Guillermo de la Dehesa - Director and Member of the Executive Committee, Grupo Santander; former Deputy Director, Banco de España
  • Mario Draghi - Governor, European Central Bank; former Chairman, Financial Stability Board; former Governor, Banca d'Italia, former Goldman Sachs Managing Director and Partner
  • William Dudley - President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Former Partner and Managing Director, Goldman Sachs
  • Martin Feldstein - Professor of Economics, Harvard University; President Emeritus, National Bureau of Economic Research - a prominent Fundamentalist Neoliberal
  • Roger Ferguson - President and Chief Executive Officer, TIAA-CREF; former Chairman, Swiss Re America Holding Corporation
  • Stanley Fischer - Governor, Bank of Israel; Former First Managing Director, International Monetary Fund; former Vice-Chairman, Citygroup; member, Bilderberg Group
  • Arminio Fraga Neto - Founding Partner, Gávea Investimentos (now owned by JP Morgan); Chairman of the Board, BM&F-Bovespa; former President of the Central Bank of Brazil; former (conservative) government advisor in Brazil
  • Gerd Häusler - CEO, Bayerisch Landesbank; Former Managing Director and Member of the Advisory Board, Lazard and Company
  • Philipp Hildebrand - Senior Visiting Fellow, Blavatnik School of Government, Oxford University; Former Chairman of the Governing Board, Swiss National Bank; Former Partner, Moore Capital Management
  • Mervyn Allister King - Governor of the Bank of England; Former Professor, London School of Economics; Fellow, The British Academy
  • Paul Krugman - Professor of Economics, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University; Former Member, Council of Economic Advisors
  • Guillermo Ortiz Martínez - President and Chairman, Grupo Finaciero Banorte; Former Governor, Banco de México; Chairman of the Board, Bank for International Settlements
  • Raghuram G. Rajan - Professor of Economics, Chicago Booth School of Business; Economic Advisor to Prime Minister of India
  • Kenneth Rogoff - Professor of Public Policy and Economics, Harvard University; Former Chief Economist, International Monetary Fund
  • Tharman Shanmugaratnam - Minister of Finance, Deputy Prime Minister Singapore; Former Managing Director, Monetary Authority of Singapore
  • Masaaki Shirakawa - Governor, Bank of Japan; Former Professor, Kyoto University School of Government
  • Lawrence Summers - Charles W. Eliot University Professor, Harvard University; Former Director, US National Economic Council; Former President, Harvard University; Former US Treasury Secretary
  • Lord Adair Turner - Chairman, UK Financial Services Authority; Member of the House of Lords, United Kingdom
  • Sir David Walker - Senior Advisor, Morgan Stanley International, Inc.; Former Chairman, UK Securities and Investments Board (now FSA)
  • Axel A. Weber - Chairman, UBS Visiting Professor of Economics, Chicago Booth School of Business; Former President, Deutsche Bundesbank
  • Yutaka Yamaguchi - Former Deputy Governor, Bank of Japan; Former Chairman, Euro Currency Standing Commission
  • Ernesto Zedillo - Director, Yale Center for the Study of Globalization, Yale University, and Former President of Mexico
  • Zhou Xiaochuan - Governor, People's Bank of China; Former President, Chinese Construction Bank; Former Asst. Minister of Foreign Trade (China)

The European Union's Ombudsman, Nikiforos Diamandouros, thinks that Draghi's membership in this lobby is incompatible with his role as Supereme Pontiff of the Euro-finances. The matter is under investigation and may take months before any conclusion is reached. 

But the real fact is that this G30 and possibly other less known forums are shadow governments (or senates if you wish) of the World's effective administration. And we all know that if banksters and super-oligarchs rule the World, the World has a big problem. 

Real Democracy Now! Banksters to the guillotine!

Thursday, June 14, 2012

500 farmer families 'brutally' evicted in Honduras

The farmers evicted by the police and military at San Manuel, Cortés department, north from the capital Tegucigalpa, had previously occupied lands owned by the state and illegally occupied with impunity by private for-profit companies. The farmers, organized in the San Manuel Farmer Movement (Movimiento Campesino San Manuel) were backed in their claims by the National Agrarian Institute (INA). 

The dispute has complex legal ramifications but judge José Antonio Barahona resolved in a matter of hours in favor of the oligarchs. 

There are at least 21 people arrested: 18 women, a minor, an elderly and an adult man.

Source: LINyM[es].

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Protest in Katowice, Poland, against the European Economic Congress

The people of Eastern Europe is angry and wary of the future of our continent being discussed behind closed doors, as if the word "democracy" ("people's power" in Greek), would have lost all meaning. Therefore they are going out to the streets in protest:


Source: Contra Info.

More info (in Polish language) HERE.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Greece: police agents to be rented out to private hirers for as little as 20 euros/hr

The Greek state will not cut down its expenditures in military nor police forces, after all that is what a state is ultimately: armed forces. 

But they will rent them to private actors as mercenary forces and escorts for as little as €20 per hour for a motorcycle escort, €30 for a police agent (with unclear role) and €40 for a car escort. €200 will be the hourly cost of a patrol boat and €1500 for a helicopter.

According to the Greek tyranny (where are the promised April elections?) this is meant to defuse the accusations of the state favoring the elite so services that were in the past provided free of charge such as escorts will now be paid for. But you tell me how a common citizen, for example a gender violence victim, may be able to afford anything like that with today's Greek salaries! The result can only be an even greater elitism of the police forces and of whom they protect. 

The mercenariness of police forces, previously unspoken and implicit, has only been made explicit with this measure and can only lead to the total disintegration of the Greek state.

Source: Digital Journal (and several others).

Friday, November 18, 2011

Goldman Sachs taking over Europe

That is something that I have been chewing on since I wrote this entry two days ago. Now such an unexpected help as a columnist of The Independent, S. Foley, cries the same truth with even more data: Goldman is not just taking over Italy, Greece and the BCE but nearly all EU states.


Technocrats my ass! They all belong to a tiny political clique of right-wing powermongers, no wonder that they appointed a Nazi as minister in Greece: for them all is the same unless they are true socialists, communists or anarchists, challenging their sense of entitlement over the World and our lives. 

Even before the upheaval in Italy, there was no sign of Goldman Sachs living down its nickname as "the Vampire Squid", and now that its tentacles reach to the top of the eurozone, sceptical voices are raising questions over its influence.

 It may be too late.

Simon Johnson, the former International Monetary Fund economist, in his book 13 Bankers, argued that Goldman Sachs and the other large banks had become so close to government in the run-up to the financial crisis that the US was effectively an oligarchy.

But Europe is not too different. We just have been blind until recently, hoping that somehow the evilness of the various oligarchs canceled each other. Maybe but now they all serve the same dark master: Goldman Sachs. No competition anymore, no markets anymore but in name, just concentrated property in a single vortex of boundless greed and megalomania.

But who owns Goldman Sachs? Because behind such a corporate facade there's always one or a handful of key people who own the key votes and key councilor seats and who ultimately appoint the executive decision makers. 

Incidentally a shallow answer can be found with relative ease: the main stockholder is FMR (Fidelity Investments), owning slightly more than 7 million shares. 

Fidelity and other four finance corporations own really all what matters in North America, Europe, Japan and probably most of the rest of the planet. But as far as I know they are middle-men, hiding the tracks of the investors they serve to. 

Who are they? Or who is he/her? Maybe there's a single masterful monopoly player who has managed to accumulate all the key stock in his/her hands but we all are oblivious to his/her identity. This is the answer I (and you) want to know? Where is Anonymous and Wikileaks when you really need them?

In the meantime I blame personally Edward Johnson III for all what happens in Europe.  This is him, don't let his smile deceive you:

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Who does really rule the world?

Lisa Karpova at Pravda (in English) makes a great, much needed, review of what we know and what we do not know. 

The essence of her conclusions I quote:


In short: the eight largest U.S. financial companies (JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, U.S. Bancorp, Bank of New York Mellon and Morgan Stanley) are 100% controlled by ten shareholders and we have four companies always present in all decisions: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity. 

... 



The same "big four" control the vast majority of European companies counted on the stock exchange.

In addition, all these people run the large financial institutions, such as the IMF, the European Central Bank or the World Bank, and were "trained" and remain "employees" of the "big four" that formed them.

The names of the families that control the "big four", never appear.

Who are they exactly? As (unwilling) subjects of their shadowy dictatorship we must find out.


What does Wikipedia tells us about these four companies:





Key people: Laurence D. "Larry" Fink (Chairman & CEO) and Robert S. Kapito (President).   They both began their careers at First Boston corporation (nowadays Credit Suisse).


Fink, third from left, receiving the Wilson Awards

Fink and Kapito co-founded (sic) Black Rock in 1988 under the umbrella (sic) of Blackstone (founded in 1985). How much do they own of their own company? Are they two of the handful who rule Earth?






Unlike Black Rock, State Street Corporation has more than two centuries behind being founded in 1792, the same year that monarchy was first abolished in France.

Unlike the Black Rock case Wikipedia has no article on the person who as President and CEO steers this powerful emporium: Jay Hooley.

However, as any good feudal lord, they have their own tower in Boston (pictured).







The third power is The Vanguard Group, founded by John C. Bogle in 1975. However he was totally excluded by his hand-picked heir John Brennan since 1996. Brennan was previously chairman of the ICI, which is like an elite club of speculators (they say investors but it's just an euphemism) for what I can discern.






The fourth power is Fidelity Investments, founded in 1946 in Boston.  The founder Johnson family still controls the company: Edward Johnson III, son and namesake of the founder, is Chairman and CEO, his daughter Abigail Johnson is co-President and leads a branch of the company. They are the 40th and 22nd richest US citizens respectively, according to Forbes.

Another key person is Kathleen Murphy (pictured), who is co-President and leads a second branch of the company. She comes from the Dutch bank ING.



These people are all extremely rich and powerful, controlling many other powerful companies and, through them the Fed and the ECB, among many other power resorts. But they largely act as managers for others: who are they? As de facto rulers of the World, they must respond to the People. 

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

External article: 'The Financial Zoo: An Interview with Satyajit Das – Part I' (at Naked Capitalism)

Satyajit Das is an internationally respected expert on finance with over 30 years working experience in the industry. He is also a best-selling author and a regular contributor to leading finance blogs – including our very own Naked Capitalism. His new book ‘Extreme Money: Masters of the Universe and the Cult of Risk’ is out now and available from Amazon in hardcover and Kindle versions.

Interview conducted by Philip Pilkington, a journalist and writer based in Dublin, Ireland.


Most delicious excerpts:

Fraternities; ‘frat boys’ (and they are mainly boys) as the Americans would say. It’s a monoculture. They generally go to the same schools, the same universities; they have similar backgrounds and spend time with each other reinforcing their narrow worldview. Even the few outsiders who make it in – usually by dint of sheer desire and skill, usually in making money – seek to be ‘insiders’. It means that they can only see the world through the same lenses and perspectives. They can’t think outside the consensus – whatever it is at a given time. They can’t see that things could be different to what they perceive it to be.

They also see themselves as superior beings – ‘God but with a better suit’. The reason for their superiority is that they make more money than anyone else which in my view is purely accidental.

...

It’s amazing how much money you can make just shuffling paper backwards and forwards. Malcolm Gladwell wrote a piece praising John Paulson who made a killing from the subprime disaster as an entrepreneur. But what did he make? What did he leave behind?

...

It’s silly to think that everybody in finance is ‘evil’ or engaged in fraud (though there are people who assert that). Most people involved are very smart, diligent, hard working and passionate about what they do. Ironically, so were most of the people who created great social upheavals – the Chinese Cultural Revolution, Pol Pot’s Year Zero project, pogroms etc.

It’s ‘groupthink’. They have ways of thinking about the world. They think it’s the right way so they keep trying it again and again. At least until there is a horrendous disruption and then they go: “Oh dear! There’s a problem.”

Take Alan Greenspan. He thought deregulated markets were the solution. He thought that any problem could be fixed by flooding the system with money. He was wrong, but even today he doesn’t really see that his world view is erroneous. They are very good at rationalisation and don’t tolerate dissent.

...

Finance has led to a serious misallocation of resources. The best and the brightest moved from real engineering into financial engineering. If you believe that real growth comes from innovation, improvements in productivity etc. then this was a serious issue.

...

Most financial models are wrong, only the degree of error is in question.

...

The models were really created to package up relatively simple products and make them more complicated to allow banks to earn economic rents – that is, excess returns – from them. They were designed to arbitrage capital rules and increase leverage. They were also useful in helping banks’ upfront earnings. Everybody appeared very clever, but it was all kind of a fake sophistication.

...

Friday, July 29, 2011

Argentina: three killed in brutal police repression

At least three people have been murdered by police forces in the Argentinean province of Jujuy, largely inhabited by Native Americans. Other 50 people resulted injured, including one with a bullet in the head fighting between life and death.

The violence was caused by police forces attacking people who had occupied lands property of Ledesma S.A., a company owned by the Blaquier family, a rotten oligarchic clan of accomplices of fascism. The company owns all the land of the village Libertador  and was therefore required by the state legally to give a tiny fraction away, so the village could grow. This is is the background of the occupation that some 500 families were realizing.

However, without any apparent judicial order, by decision of Kirchnerist governor Walter Barrionuevo, who is totally supportive of the oligarchic Blaquier family, police attacked the occupants with tear gas, rubber bullets and live ammunition, to what the locals replied with stone throwing, although police accuses them of using guns as well.

Among the dead are two citizens and one policeman. Their names are: Ariel and Alejandro Farfán and Félix Reyes.


Source: La Haine[es].


Update (Jul 31): there are finally four killed: 3 citizens and a policeman. The civilian victims are: Félix Reyes Pérez, Víctor Heredia and Ariel Farfán. Also at least 30 injured, some of live fire and also many children poisoned by tear gas.


 Source: La Haine[es].

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Honduras: more murders confirm the Colombian way to Hell

Harvesting rice in Aguán
The Honduran regime is clearly taking the Colombian way to Hell, in other words: to the service of corporations and oligarchs by means of massive murder of civilians, notably struggling peasants, honest journalists...

Yesterday morning Sixto Ramos (45), member of the cooperative company Suyapa, part of the Peasnant Movement of Aguán (MCA) was murdered when he drove to work. 

In the Bajo Aguán district there is a very harsh struggle between peasants demanding the return of lands robbed by caciques in the last 20 years and the death squads paid by these oligarchs and supported often by police and military forces of the state, which saw a fascist coup in 2009. 

Communitarian health center
28 peasant activists have been murdered in the last 15 months (since the coup). Last week Paulino Lemus Cruz and Henry Roney Díaz were murdered as well in the Aguán basin. Two peasants have also been kidnapped recently (one of them liberated after torture, the other still missing). In addition also a journalist was killed near Tegucigalpa, the capital (and he's not the first one either).

Meanwhile the campaign to normalize the status of Honduras in the international sphere continues. 

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Economic fallacies: 'Eurosclerosis'

Is this Eurosclerosis?
Jumping around through the net I just stumbled upon what looked a pretty and forgotten jewel of vocabulary: Eurosclerosis. It has a Wikipedia entry (half-referenced) and what not! 

I was briefly seduced by the potential illustrative meanings of this word: it would of course mean a hybrid of Jacques Delors, Silvio Berlusconi and Angela Merkel, a morph of all the old people living on EU salaries just to spit on Europeans and lick banksters' boots. Surely someone looked at the unpopular Commissioners babbling before the grey and pointless Parliament and caught by a hellish (but way too real) vision of Margaret Thatcher having tea with Pinochet conceived such a horrific but descriptive concept: Eurosclerosis.

Too good? Maybe it was something more prosaic and just meant the tendency to have a thicker layer of old people, or an increasing waistline, following the US fashion?

Nope it is an idea from liberal (pro-market, anti-state) economists describing an economic problem: why Europe (or some states in Europe) experienced nominal (GDP) economic growth while not reducing unemployment. According to an unreferenced (but plausible) ideological remark at the end of the wiki-article:
The term was originally coined by German economist Herbert Giersch to describe how overregulation and a generous welfare state will undermine efficiency and job creation.[citation needed]

Hold on! 

The perfect example of Eurosclerosis would be Spain, where nearly no welfare (other than pensions, extremely brief unemployment benefits and general healthcare) exist, where salaries are very low (in comparison with, say, Germany, France, the UK or Italy) and where labor rights were destroyed in the 1980s (by the so-called Socialdemocrats, mind you) up to a point that, in practical terms, total deregulation in relation to labor exists now. 

Spain is an almost totally deregulated market yet unemployment is over 20% and used to be very high even before the latest crisis, always about double than elsewhere in Europe in spite of having a less regulated labor market and much worse welfare. 

So Spain is the perfect example of Eurosclerosis but it does not respond to the liberal analysis of that Giersch guy. Would it be that deregulation in the job market alone would (magic, whoa!) create jobs, Spain would have no or almost no unemployment. The opposite is true. In fact Spain has a very weak economy in spite of a very high growth of GDP precisely because it lacks a solid welfare state. 

Regardless of the benefits for workers and social stability. Well understood welfare, for instance oriented to guarantee cheap basics (housing, healthcare, education, electricity, water, sanitation, low-times economic parachutes) for all, reduces costs country-wide. Workers need less money, so they can also work for less, becoming more competitive. 

Another way of increasing competitiveness (also applied by the alleged success story of Europe: Germany) is to specialize in more expensive products, typically more technologically rich or of higher quality). This requires investment in R+D and a non-corrupt environment that offers quality and seriousness guarantees. While for example there is some investment on that in the Basque Country or Catalonia, Spain as such mostly passes of that stuff (it's sociological, I believe). 

But still that does not explain the massive lack of jobs. The only thing that explains Spain's Eurosclerosis is that liberalism, free market, does not work: that it is a lie. No matter how much you dump your work's price, there are no jobs.

It's not just Spain: it's worse in North Africa, where unemployment reaches 40%, plus all the youths who have been forced to emigrate, risking their lives, to Europe and elsewhere. These are cheap-labor countries, typically with all the business-friendly policies you can imagine, even corruption is not that high considering how poor they are and how autocratic are their governments.

So it has only one explanation free market is a lie. 

And this brings to only two possible proactive conclusions:

Under Capitalist ("free market" lie) conditions:
  1. Restore welfare, make sure that the cost of life is low, so people do not need so much money just to live that they cannot work for less. 
  2. Very specially make sure that your people's needs do not become a market for foreign "investors" (bloodsucking speculators that take all and leave nothing) but that they produce what others need. Import little, export much - at least as much as you import. 
  3. Tax as needed: if you are a net importer, global markets are not your friend. 
If you can escape Capitalist conditions, do it. Some free market (where a very high number of dynamic independent actors can be guaranteed) may be useful locally but oligopolistic "markets" are no markets at all and must be avoided. Better a "bad" state monopoly than a truly much worse private oligopoly (or often monopoly as well). Private monopolies are no better than public ones, they are typically much worse. 

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

The true president of Haiti is... Bill Clinton

AlterPresse: riots at Cap Hatien today
It seems that the US Empire is really reaching the age of the proconsuls, as did the Roman Empire at some point of its expansive drive. Proconsul means former consul and consul was the rough equivalent of co-president in the Roman Republic (there were two of them instead of just one as happens now). As happens with Clinton now, former consuls were often appointed as provincial governors, hence the later usage of the term proconsul. It must be said that Roman provinces (from pro-vincere: formerly conquered) were typically more impressive than Haiti but that's another story.

This is at least what Henri Boisrolin (Democratic Committee of Haiti) declared to Uruguayan radio program Resonando en Fénix, interview partly transcribed by La Haine[es].

Some translated fragments from this interview:


UN troops are rapists

The presence of the MINUSTAH (UN Mission for the stabilization of Haiti)... is a violation of the sovereignty of our people and a violation of the principle of self-determination of the Haitian people.

The MINUSTAH [troops] have raped our girls and women... they prevented nothing with the hurricanes, the floods. In the earthquake the showed total inefficiency before, while and after it [happened]. 


Haitian oligarchies have lost control

The Haitian dominant classes have lost control: they cannot win any elections. [Haiti] is a country where the USA cannot allow things to follow their natural course and end in a popular uprising that ends in the construction of a popular power. We must not forget that Haiti is the country closest to Cuba... shares the island with the Dominican Republic, we are just a few minutes away by air from Puerto Rico and Jamaica...


The 2004 coup

Aristide is a populist who betrayed but who kept some ambiguity; he was not any safe card for US policies...

There were then many riots and demonstrations demanding the resignation of Aristide, and a military uprising organized by the USA and the Haitian oligarchy, with former members of the Duvalier militia [the much hated Tonton Macoutes]. They organized them, they armed them in the Dominican Republic and sent them through the border... but then they realized these forces would not be enough to depose Aristide, so a US military commando got in and kidnapped him. 


The UN occupation forces are a dangerous precedent

The governments that sent troops for the MINUSTAH [Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Guatemala, Sri Lanka, Jordan, Peru, Ecuador...] should realize that, if this [model] succeeds in Haiti, then it may happen anywhere else, under any other pretext. I am saying that they have created a too dangerous precedent for the future of Latin American peoples, specially when there are strong winds of change blowing in Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia...


Slave-like multinational exploitation

Haiti is the country that produces the largest amounts of ultra-cheap workforce. Hence we have tax-free zones where Levis' jeans are made: 3000 people working in conditions of practical slavery for multinational corporations. 

The daily salary is not more than USD3 [yes: three damn bucks] per day. It is really nothing. Last year they wanted their salaries raised, there were large mobilizations. But Preval (formally the President) said "no" and the MINUSTAH helped with repression. 


Preval is a puppet, the real president is Bill Clinton

In 2006 people went to vote [for Preval] because they though he would make Aristide come back. Nowadays Preval is the most hated president in the history of Haiti, not just because of the treason to Aristide but because of the neoliberal policy and the policy of kneeling before the so-called International Community, not just before the MINUSTAH but specially before the USA. 

The real president of the country is nowadays... Bill Clinton. Clinton fulfills three roles: he is representative for the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon for Haiti, he is representative for US President Obama, along with former President Bush, to manage US aid... to Haiti, and finally they have created after the earthquake something called CIRH (Interim Commission for the Reconstruction of Haiti) and the guy, without being Haitian, is nevertheless president, together with the Haitian Prime Minister, of the CIRH. He is the one who decides when the CIRH meets, where, which is the schedule, what has to be rebuilt, he is the proconsul as we say over there: the one who is really in command. 

Preval is a puppet, he is a scarecrow with a totally alienated behavior... he does not even have a remnant of dignity. 


Popular organization

They make the people believe that Haiti is an inviable country, a failed state, an impossible nation, a people treated like a baby who must be fed, that there is no organization...

This is not true: there are farmer organizations, worker organizations, political parties with projects and clear ideologies, student organizations, labor unions, even class unions like Batay Ouvriye... Even the mobilizations against famine in the year 2008, the mobilizations for higher salaries, when workers went to the streets along with students... they all show that there is a mobilized people. 


If MINUSTAH leaves...

The only people in Haiti worried about what will happen in MINUSTAH leaves are those belonging to the dominant classes, because they know what that will mean for them and their interests.

We understand that the only thing that can solve the Haitian crisis is the arrival and construction of a Popular Power that answers directly to the interests of the Haitian masses. For this, as we say, you cannot make an omelet without breaking some eggs. 

The feeling of the Haitian people is one of growing hatred towards the MINUSTAH and specially towards Latin American [troops]... Stay by any faculty and wait for a MINUSTAH tank to pass by. The least students will do, the first thing they do is to throw rocks at it. 


Cuban friendship

The aid we need is like what Cubans have brought for instance: in 12 years of presence of Cuban physicians not a single Cuban soldier has arrived. Same for Venezuela, which helps with the energy. 

Even in the [2004] coup nothing happened to Cubans because they have the protection of the People.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Agricultural subsidies beneficiaries to be hidden

In a most insulting and hypocritical ruling, the European Tribunal has decreed that declaring who benefits from the huge EU agricultural subsides violates "the right to privacy". Hence in the future we will not be informed that hyper-rich aristocratics like the Queen of England (€500,000 in 2008) or the Duchess of Alba (two million!) receive from our taxes, via Brussels, huge amounts of money that fatten even more their already obscene accumulation of what belong to us all.

This is yet another abuse by the European oligarchy and underlines the need for a pan-European revolution that eradicates private property and get those parasites to work (or to a retirement house in some cases - or even to jail possibly). 

Sources: La otra economía, Farmsusbidy.org

See also the last list of Euro-Agro-Billionaire-Parasites, you won't see such a list anymore, it seems.