Showing posts with label Azawad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Azawad. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Azawad: from Joder Pasha and Faidherbe to Al Qaeda the new imperialism

According to Algeria¹, the infiltration of Jihaddists from Libya into Azawad (Northern Mali) has been financed by key Western allies, namely Qatar and Morocco, benefiting from the pointless military coup of a US puppet general last year, which led to the independence of Azawad, soon captured by the internationalist fundamentalist forces of Al Qaeda in the Islamic Mahgreb (West), originally the Salafist Front. Ironically now France and the USA have launched a military intervention against the very forces deployed by their dearly allies. 

Morocco has got since independence diffuse claims on Mali (it also used to claim West Sahara, Mauritania and large swathes of Algeria). The imperialist rationale behind it comes from the colonial expedition of Joder Pasha (also Judar, Yuder), a Castilian renegade (originally Diego de Guevara, born in Andalusia) arguably nicknamed on his favorite swearword: "joder" (fuck), who, after purchasing some cannons to England, launched a trans-Saharan campaign against the Songhai Empire... and won. Sadly for the Moroccan imperialists the profits of this colonial enterprise in search of the fabled gold of Sudan, parallel in all to European trans-Oceanic one, were little and gradually the Moroccan rule over Azawad vanished.

But the autocrats of Morocco, reveling as they do on history, myth and tradition, as well as an all-pervading police state, probably still dream with exerting their influence across the Ocean of Sand. In any case, the two aforementioned dictators, along with Saudi Arabia and others of their ilk, have for long financed Islamist Fascist terrorist forces in the hope of reaping some benefits and keep at bay the ghost of rationalism that would destroy their golden thrones of vanity and greed. 

This policy is of course supported in general terms by their Western allies, notably the USA, France and Britain, as well as Israel, who only see opportunities for military meddling in this sock-puppeteering farcical game.

This was most obvious in Afghanistan, where the farce of Al Qaeda and the criminal inside job of the 9-11 attacks, provided a pretext for US and NATO intervention in Central Asia, a key region of the international chessboard. For some time now the USA has sought to consolidate their presence in Africa, the only continent that holds no US bases... yet. The Mali war is probably such engineered opportunity and France is playing their role as good major ally with a consolidated presence in the region. 

So far many West Africans, unconscious, cheer French intervention. Even in Azawad itself the many people already offended by the Islamo-Fascist tyranny, that has forced women to wear veil, stumped hands, leashed backs, cut heads off and destroyed venerated shrines, will welcome anything... really. 

The very Tuareg activists of the Azawad National Liberation Movement (MLNA) almost do. They wow to fight against the Islamists who they could not contain much less defeat for lack of decent weapons (they have always said: give us weapons that we will take care of the fundamentalists ourselves and gladly so). However they want a comprehensive agreement with Mali that ends a war that has lasted for too long. 

But what Tuaregs and Songhai want is not too important for Mali, much less for any of the geostrategical players involved: France, the USA, Morocco and Qatar (at least). They probably do not even truly want to conquer Azawad at all, a most challenging endeavor without doubt, what they want is a pretext to consolidate their influence and military presence in the region. 

So the Azawadis (and by extension other West Africans probably) have a very rough ride ahead while the masters of puppet Islamo-Fascism laugh in their golden palaces.


PS- And who was Faidherbe, you may ask? Why, of course... the founder of the French colonial empire in West Africa, who conquered Kayes to the Toucouleur Empire, allied with the dominant ethnicity of modern and historical Mali: the Bambara. In a sense he can be considered the founder of modern Mali and also of the ongoing bombings by French airplanes of the millenarian cities of the Niger Bend.

¹ Correction: I first said wrongly that the source was the MLNA. It is the Algerian government in fact (taken from Basque newspaper Gara, printed edition).  

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Azawad, Islamists, Saudi Arabia...

The first thing everyone should know about Sunni Islamists almost anywhere is that they are paid, organized and rallied by Saudi Arabia, which has been applying the same medicine in their own territory for decades already. 

People raise their hands to heaven when the Taliban destroy the giant Buddhas or when Ansar Dine destroys the shrines of Timbuktu. But who has armed them? Saudi Arabia and their Zionist cronies. If you happen to read Berber sites such as Tamazgha[fr], you notice that the Ansar Dine Islamo-Fascist militia is armed with the best weapons and that is why it is being able to keep at bay not just the small and demoralized Malian army but also the actual popular militia, the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA) which has been pushed out of the main cities, Gao and Timbuktu, because they have no support but their own.

Saudi Arabia has been doing exactly the same thing that Ansar Dine does now and nobody, except some Arabic-language media, has questioned it. In the name of Islamic purity, the fundamentalist authorities of Saudi Arabia have done exactly the same: over 300 shrines and historical landmarks were destroyed only in Mecca in the name of Allah (so to say), even the very home of Mohamed was razed in this idiotic crusade against the traditional expression of Muslim faith. 

So nobody should be surprised that the Ansar Dine fanatics are doing exactly the same. And nobody should wonder where do they get the weapons from: Saudi Arabia and their Arabist (anti-Berber) cronies in North Africa, who are trying that way to destroy not just the Sufi shrines but also the Tuareg and Songhai state of Azawad. 

Probably they have something else in mind: creating a chaotic situation led by their fanatic sockpuppets in order to propitiate the intervention of the USA, which has been looking for years now for opportunities to set up permanent bases in Africa, the only continent where they have almost no presence. 

In the end, the House of Saud and the Islamo-Fascists are all conspiring in favor of US imperial intervention, be it in Central Asia, the Persian Gulf or West Africa. That is what the Saudis (including the Bin Laden clan) truly want, that is what Israel wants and that is what the imperialist hawks in Washington want: to consolidate the Imperial domination everywhere with the pretext of Islamism, which they secretly feed via Riyadh.

______________________ . ______________________ 

Communication issued by the Collective of Cadres of Azawad (CCA) in June 22nd (source: French original at Tamazagha)

After April 1st 2012, date of the retreat of the last Malian Army's soldier and the total liberation of Azawad, jihadist gangs, parasitizing the the military victories of the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA), have not stopped multiplying their provocations and overt attacks against the population (beatings, whippings, destruction of goods, etc.)

These provocations culminated with the savage repression against the women's march in Kidal, on June 5 2012, and the flagellation sessions inflicted to the Azawadian citizens in Timbuktu, on June 20 2012.

At the instance of the ulemas and notables met in conclave at Kidal, the organizations of the civil society, the cadres, the coordinations of refugee camps, the associations of women of Azawad, the MNLA, including the voice of the illustrious Amenokal Intalla Ag Attaher, we condemn, without any reserve, these particularly barbaric behavior, opposed to our culture and our concept of human dignity.

On June 22nd 2012

In the name of the Collective of Cadres of Azawad (CCA)
The Speaker,
Habaye Ag Mohamed

Sunday, June 17, 2012

Nigeria's bloc wants to intervene against Azawad

I actually take it as a sign of the new sovereign state of Azawad (the state of Tuareg, Songhai and other Saharan peoples of what used to be Northern Mali) being rather consolidated for the Nigerian-led bloc ECOWAS to be pushing for intervention.

In any case, that is what the ECOWAS, in principle just an economic association, is planning to do: to build an international intervention force in Mali, to succor the transitional government (the product of a US-inspired coup that backfired) and eventually intervene against Azawad.

Meanwhile the Azawad authorities are being formed with full normality and they state that they will not surrender: Al Qaeda comes and goes but the Tuareg are bound to their land, they explain:


 


The Azawad government does not support Al Qaeda, and is actually feeling threatened by them. 

Source: Al Jazeera.

Saturday, April 7, 2012

France and the African Union oppose Azawad's independence

New state: Azawad
The actors are different but the reasons are the same: both France (and its satellite Spain) and the artificial post-colonial African states fear that the status quo of these unnatural states imposed on the reality of ethnicities and often also on the true will of the affected peoples will spread like an epidemic of sorts causing the collapse of the old world order. 

There are many other cases I can think of but this problem specially affects Southwestern Europe, which is still to enjoy the benefits of national self-determination as Central and Eastern Europe and even Ireland could achieve in the 20th century, and Africa, where states are in most cases nothing but capriciously drawn colonial administrative divisions.

North Africa faces the issue of the Berber minorities, demanding independence or at least greater autonomy in Algeria and Morocco specially, where they are more numerous, but the situation is totally dramatic south of the Sahara, where almost not a single polity approaches the modern concept of nation-state.

This issue has triggered long and/or bloody separatist wars by areas and ethnicities which find themselves disadvantaged in the states assigned, often dividing them in several arbitrary portions. Some of the most notable secessionist struggles have been:
  • Casamance (vs. Senegal)
  • Biafra (vs. Nigeria)
  • Katanga (vs. Congo/Zaire)
  • South Sudan (vs. Sudan, suceeded)
  • Darfur (vs. Sudan)
  • Eritrea (vs. Ethiopia, succeeded)
  • Somalis in Ethiopia (vs. Ethiopia)
  • Tuaregs (vs. Mali, Niger and Algeria)
There are also other cases  in which a territory has been more or less arbitrarily assigned to a neighboring country against the will of the people, even if the case of distinct ethnicity is not so clear. This is the case of West Sahara, whose military annexation to Morocco is mostly rejected, and of Somaliland, whose incorporation to Somalia was challenged more recently and has declared its independence unilaterally as well. 

And the dissatisfaction with the post-colonial political arrangements does not just manifest in secessionism and the occasional religious conflict but also in civil wars and other internal conflicts, which often run across ethnic lines. 

In fact it is scientifically demonstrated that ethnicities which have been divided as result of border-drawing suffer the most from all kind of conflicts, at least in Africa (though I'd dare say this applies to all). 

In brief: the Jacobin neocolonial regimes organized by the former colonial power, France, in the Francophonie and in general all the regimes produced by the scramble of Africa 130 years ago (and the unfinished decolonization of 50-60 years ago), associated in the African Union, fight and will fight by all means at their reach against the right of self-determination of the peoples in Africa as in Europe. 

However reality is gradually overriding their Jacobin dictates. Eventually, it is inevitable that the artificial borders are redrawn by the peoples themselves.

Friday, April 6, 2012

New sovereign state: Azawad

The Tuareg rebels from Northern Mali, who, following the stupidest coup ever (US-supported, of course), captured (or liberated) Timbuktu, Gao and other cities, have stopped military operations and proclaimed the independence of Azawad

It is almost the first Berber state since ancient times (with the occasional exception like the Rif Republic in the 1920s), although it also includes other ethnic groups besides Tuaregs, notably Songhai, the also nomadic Fulani, some Arab-speaking Moors and some presence of southern ethnicities like the Bozo and Mandinka.  

Approx. borders of the new state (tan) with mention of some ethnicities